Most popular ▴ See a list of all my posts! The experts got it wrong. Why are there no great Windows 10 apps? How moving the Capital helps Hartlepool. Gender bias calculator The Centre of the UK Defending Uber BusTracker Imagination not needed. Part 1. Imagination not needed. Part 2. Imagination not needed. Part 3. Why Birmingham fails Who is London? Innovation on buses. Heathrow

PDFs and Data ▾ Global open data and PDFs. Improving PDFs for Science. Improving PDFs for Planners. PDFAttacher. A Clearer Plan Hybrid PDFs PDF test-off. PDF Profiler Making PDFs play nicely with data

Housing ▾ Counting households. 1. Counting households. 2. The housing market works (where we let it) Hexmaps Adonis is wrong on housing Car free Birmingham

Regional Growth ▾ Measuring tech in the UK and France in 10 steps. Defending the Zombie graph. Channel 4 must move to Mancheseter Measuring innovation 1: meetups Measuring innovation 2: scientific papers. The UK city-size abnormality. Cities not cheese: why France is productive. How moving the Capital helps Hartlepool. Industrial Strategy. Leeds Growth Strategy 5: Limits. Leeds Growth Strategy 4: Focus. Leeds Growth Strategy 3: Inclusive growth. Leeds Growth Strategy 2: Where to grow? Leeds Growth Strategy 1: Why grow? Imagination not needed. Part 1. Imagination not needed. Part 2. Imagination not needed. Part 3. Inclusive growth. The BBC in Manchester 1 The BBC in Manchester 2 What works (growth) North-South divide: we never tried Imitating Manchester Why Birmingham fails Who is London? Researching research Replacing UK steel The Economist & The North The State of the North, 2015 Move the Lords! Calderdale Digital Strategy Maths of inequality Income by MSOA Heathrow and localism The NorthernPowerhouse Centralism and Santa Claus Yorkshire backwards London makes us poor

Transport ▾ Crossrail 2: Where trust in experts dies. Pacers: crap trains, worth keeping. A Yorkshire transport policy. Stop telling me to learn from London. Fixing it ourselves: bus data in the North. Open fare data will be hard. Transport is too complex! Investment is political London loses when it blocks Leeds' growth The Centre of the UK Defending Uber BusTracker Train time map What works (growth) The Value of Time Innovation on buses. Heathrow 1975 WYMetro Plan

Politics & Economics ▾ GDP measures are like toilets. The UK's private postcodes restrict innovation. Yorkshire could learn from Ireland's success. Alternatives to GDP are a waste of time. Fiscal balance in the UK "Not like London" Innovation takes time to measure Fifa and the right In defence of the € GDP mystery Liberal protectionists 5 types of EU voter Asylum responsibilities STEM vs STEAM The Economist & Scotland BBC Bias? Northern rail consultation What holds us back? Saving the Union Summing it up

Positive ▾ Bike Lights Playful Everywhere Greggs vs. Pret Guardian comment generator Consult less, do more! More things for Leeds! Cartoons PubQuest: Birmingham

Tech ▾ What's holding back opendata in the UK? Anti-trust law saved computing 1 Anti-trust law saved computing 2 Open Data Camp Cardiff Why are there no great Windows 10 apps? Tap to pay. Open Data in Birmingham Defending Uber BusTracker Train time map Building a TechNation How the UK holds back TechNorth GDS is Windows 8 OpenData at the BBC SimFlood SimSponge See me speak Digital Health Leeds Empties Leeds Site Allocations Building a Chrome extension I hate webkit Visualising mental health Microsoft's 5 easy wins Epson px700w reset Stay inside the Bubble

Old/incomplete ▾ Orange price rises The future of University Cherish our Capital Dealing with NIMBYs Sponsoring the tube Gender bias calculator MetNetMaker Malaria PhD Symbian Loops Zwack Kegg Project The EU Eduroam & Windows 8 Where is science vital? The Vomcano 10 things London can shove Holbeck Waterwheel

Last modified: 17 November 2017

One Nobel Prize and a Yorkshire transport policy.

The Bristol Economics Festival has over £15 of my money and I couldn’t be happier. A speaker in the first session mentioned my work, Chris Giles’ conversation with Nobel prize winner Jean Tirole was fantastic, and Bristol is a fantastic city of lovely people that I love visiting.

In Jean Tirole’s talk he explained the downsides of France’s rigid labour market. A system that protects permanent jobs so well that no-one wants to create them. A system that thus means that 90% of new jobs in France are temporary and the young, minorities, and those that lose their jobs close to retirement are too frequently left unemployed or pushed into economic inactivity. “If the labour system is a weakness of France, what are the weaknesses of the UK?” was the best question of the session. Tirole cleverly avoided it, it was not his place to lecture others on what to do. I wish his wisdom was more common within policy circles in the UK.

I kept thinking about that question on my walk back to Bristol Temple Meads for the last fast train back to Birmingham. I agree that France’s labour system is weaker than the rest of North Europe’s. It protects jobs and not workers even though it is people, workers, who matter more.

And yet despite the clear disadvantages, France’s economy is the equal of the UK’s. It must be making up in other areas, even if Tirole did not know or did not wish to say. Thinking about what those areas are has bought me around to reply to a question I was asked recently.

If I were the Transport Minister for Yorkshire, what would I do?

The answer to this is pretty simple, I’d copy France. Transport is an area where it bridges the gap caused by its anti-worker labour market rules. Many of France's regions are similar to Yorkshire. Almost all of them are more prosperous.

So here’s what I’d do. Most of it isn’t possible within current UK law and constitution, but I have restricted myself to then changes and investments we might reasonably expect to make in the next five years. There are no monorails, hyperloops, or autonomous vehicles in my plan.

  1. Devolve almost all transport policy and funding to Yorkshire’s two big city regions. The first act of a Yorkshire transport minister should be to make themselves largely redundant. Most of Yorkshire is rural and rural transport is largely a solved problem. Buy a car and learn to drive. The rest of the points are what the transport directors of the cities should do.
  2. Regulate buses and trams in cities. As in London and every other city in Europe, buses work better and contribute most to prosperity when they are regulated. Private companies should run them under tender but the buses, trams, and trains must be forced accept a single simple ticketing system, on a pay-as-you-go smartcard similar to The Netherlands’ OV-Chipkaart or Dublin’s Leap Card. The fares must go to the cities not national government or franchise holders.
  3. Give cities full control over commuter rail networks. Commuter railways into Leeds and Sheffield should be controlled by Leeds and Sheffield in a similar way to how London controls London Overground. Passenger transport executives already exist to do this.
  4. Cut bus services outside of cities. Most of Yorkshire’s poverty is in cities where bus services are cheap to provide. Most rural residents have access to a car. The main purpose of public transport is to move people to and within cities so that greater economic growth can be achieved due to agglomeration effects. Rural buses do not contribute to this.
  5. Take control of rural trains. Rural train services in Yorkshire are expensive to run and do not serve the purpose of supporting growth. They should be run on a structure reflecting their community interest, with explicit subsidies. Over time I would probably reduce them.
  6. Privatise car parks in city-centres. Local government in cities with adequate public transport shouldn’t provide car parking. The market can perform this task.
  7. End free bus passes for the elderly and give them to under 16s. Free bus passes for the elderly are not a good use of money. The same money would be better invested in improving services by building bus lanes and tram routes and by electrifying train lines and lengthening trains. If education policy is still largely controlled nationally rather than locally it might be sensible to give under 16s free bus passes so that they can access multiple schools and thus gain benefits from school choice.
  8. Implement a congestion charge in big cities. It should not be free to drive in central Leeds and Sheffield at peak times. A congestion charge should be implemented both to discourage this wasteful use of road space and to raise revenue for investment.
  9. Borrow to invest in cycle paths, bus lanes, tram lines, electrified commuter railways, and longer trains. Yorkshire's cities have lots of easy opportunities to reduce operating costs of public transport by investing heavily in infrastructure. Most of this money should come from national government which has spent generously in London and the South-East and should now spend in the North where return on investment is higher. Additional funds should be raised by borrowing on the back of new local taxes.
  10. Enforce existing road laws using technology. Considerable road and pavement space for walking, cycling, and driving is currently lost to illegal parking in cities. Enforcing existing rules of the road would stop this and generate revenue. Cameras work. We should use them.

I could write much more on each policy and share the data that’s informed my decisions but we’re already at 1000 words. I have deliberately avoided discussing HS2 and HS3 which I consider to be low priorities for Yorkshire, but beyond any prospect of being decided on locally. These decisions will be made in London, for London’s benefit, for the foreseeable future.

 

blog comments powered by Disqus