Positive: Bike Lights Playful Everywhere Greggs vs. Pret Guardian comment generator Consult less, do more! More things for Leeds! Cartoons PubQuest: Birmingham

Politics: Industrial Strategy. Counting households. 1. Counting households. 2. Leeds Growth Strategy 1. Imagination not needed. Part 1. Imagination not needed. Part 2. Imagination not needed. Part 3. Calderdale Digital Strategy The Value of Time Inclusive growth. NIMBYs cause the housing crisis Innovation on buses. Fifa and the right Ward explorer Income by MSOA Heathrow and localism In defence of the € The BBC in Manchester What works (growth) Maths of inequality GDP mystery Liberal protectionists 5 types of EU voter Why Birmingham fails Who is London? Researching research Heathrow Car free Birmingham North-South divide: we never tried Imitating Manchester Asylum responsibilities The NorthernPowerhouse Centralism and Santa Claus STEM vs STEAM Replacing UK steel The State of the North, 2015 Adonis is wrong on housing The Economist & Scotland The Economist & The North The future of University BBC Bias? Yorkshire backwards London makes us poor Northern rail consultation What holds us back? Move the Lords! Saving the Union Summing it up

Tech: Tap to pay. Open Data in Birmingham Defending Uber BusTracker Building a TechNation How the UK holds back TechNorth GDS is Windows 8 OpenData at the BBC SimFlood SimSponge See me speak Train time map Digital Health Leeds Empties Leeds Site Allocations Building a Chrome extension I hate webkit Visualising mental health Microsoft's 5 easy wins Epson px700w reset Stay inside the Bubble

Old or incomplete: Orange price rises Cherish our Capital 1975 WYMetro Plan Dealing with NIMBYs Sponsoring the tube Gender bias calculator MetNetMaker Malaria PhD Symbian Loops Zwack Kegg Project The EU Eduroam & Windows 8 Where is science vital? The Vomcano 10 things London can shove Holbeck Waterwheel

Tube sponsorship should cut subsidies, not fares.

I wouldn’t normally see the BBC London news, but Christopher Cook at the FT tweeted a story and since I was on the train home from my Nan’s in Norwich, I read it.

The Conservative Party group in the London Assembly are suggesting that sponsorship for tube stations be sold to raise hundreds of millions of pounds. That sounds like a good idea to me – especially since my oyster card is currently gathering dust. But their proposal to use the money to cut fares doesn’t sound like the same Tory party I hear bemoaning big government and espousing privatisation here in Leeds.

What’s going on?

The embarrassing truth for small-state Conservatives in an urban age is that the only metropolis they govern is also the one that consumes the most of the state’s money. That’s right; more money is spent per person by the UK government in London than is spent in any other country or region. And don’t worry if you’re surprised by that statement because even as well-informed a man as Jeremy Paxman has been embarrassingly corrected on the issue, live on Newsnight.

London is, of course, a special case and for Conservatives it is doubly special because they overwhelmingly live in or around it. These people may not yet realise it, but now is their chance to set an example of small-state success for the rest of the country to follow. They also may not know that their example to follow already exists here in Leeds.

In Leeds we like sarcasm, but in many ways I'm being serious. How London's Conservatives decide to spend the money they raise selling sponsorship for tube stations will say a lot. My view, and that of much of the North of England, is that the Tories are a party of big government for themselves, and nothing for the rest of us. They won't win an election unless they can prove otherwise.